VDM: “I offer you 24 hours to apologize to him” – Doris Ogala steps in, berates Pastor Chris Okafor over lawsuit
Nollywood actress Doris Ogala has waded into the heated drama between fashionable cleric, Pastor Chris Okafor, and social media activist Martins Vincent Otse, broadly generally known as VeryDarkMan (VDM), issuing a 24-hour ultimatum to the pastor.
Actress Steps Into Ongoing Controversy
Doris Ogala’s intervention has intensified public consideration on the difficulty, as she demanded that Pastor Okafor withdraw his lawsuit in opposition to VDM and tender a public apology or face additional “publicity.”
She made this daring declaration in a video shared on her Instagram web page, the place she addressed the pastor immediately.
The actress mentioned: “Is it true that Pastor Chris Okafor’s lawyer has filed a lawsuit in opposition to VeryDarkMan? Whether it is, I’m giving Pastor Chris Okafor no more than 24 hours to apologise.”
Background of the Authorized Dispute
Pastor Chris Okafor’s authorized representatives lately confirmed that they’re continuing with a defamation case in opposition to VDM.
The transfer follows VDM’s viral interviews with a girl recognized as Miss Chi, who claims to be the pastor’s organic daughter.
The cleric has firmly dismissed the allegation, insisting that DNA outcomes show in any other case.
Ogala Questions Motive Behind Lawsuit
In her assertion, Doris Ogala described the lawsuit as an pointless and questionable transfer, calling it a “misstep” and warning that the motion may backfire.
She hinted that she possesses extra data that would complicate issues for the cleric if the case isn’t withdrawn.
Earlier Allegations Resurface
The actress additionally reignited previous claims the place she alleged she had a romantic relationship with Pastor Okafor for years.
She accused him of creating marital guarantees and allegedly influencing her private choices.
Pastor Okafor’s Authorized Crew Reacts
Legal professionals representing Pastor Okafor have insisted that their shopper is the actual sufferer, stating that he has been subjected to defamation, cyberbullying, and damaging false narratives.
They preserve that the authorized motion in opposition to VDM is crucial to defend his fame and ministry.
See beneath;